Skip to content
Aesthetics InternationalTreatments reviewed. Protocols vetted.
Reviews What works, what doesn't By concern Head to head Protocols Global faculty Journal Dr Sin Yong Ask us
WhatsApp +65 8023 7170[email protected]drsinyong.com

What works, what doesn't

Every one of the 153 treatments reviewed, sorted by verdict. Aesthetics International is a curator, not a catalogue: each verdict is reached against the same six questions, from the published studies rather than the marketing, and revised when the evidence moves. Within each verdict, treatments are ordered by how often people in Singapore search for them.

VettedUsed within an Aesthetics International protocol; mechanism, evidence and limits reviewed. 4
EstablishedLong clinical track record. Results depend on selection and technique more than on the device. 70
PromisingPlausible mechanism and early evidence. Reasonable to try with realistic expectations. 28
TrendPopular for reasons that are mostly social. Harmless at best; manage expectations. 27
CautionEvidence, regulation or risk profile does not yet support routine use. 24

Established70 treatments

Long clinical track record. Results depend on selection and technique more than on the device.

Promising28 treatments

Plausible mechanism and early evidence. Reasonable to try with realistic expectations.

Trend27 treatments

Popular for reasons that are mostly social. Harmless at best; manage expectations.

Caution24 treatments

Evidence, regulation or risk profile does not yet support routine use.

How a verdict is reached

Mechanism

Is there a plausible route from what the device or product does to the change claimed?

Evidence

Independent, published studies — not only the manufacturer's — and how large the effect really is.

Regulation

Registered with HSA for the use described, and performed by the right person in Singapore.

Selection

Who it suits, who it does not, and whether the marketing admits the difference.

Reversibility

What happens when it goes wrong, and whether it can be undone.

Limits stated

Whether the people offering it will say what it cannot do.

Verdicts are editorial and unpaid. “Vetted” means the treatment is used within one of the protocols published here and has had its mechanism, evidence and limits reviewed; it is not a claim about results, which depend on the person treated. The right treatment for any one person is decided at assessment.